mobile-main-menu-button
Menu

Category Archives: Uncategorized

  • Echem: Tech Template

    AfterMath_NEW
          This article is part of the AfterMath Data Organizer Electrochemistry Guide

    (technique name is the title of webpage)

    Brief Description

    Synonyms: synonym

    Detailed Description

    Like most of the other electrochemical techniques offered by the AfterMath software, this experiment begins with an induction period. During the induction period, a set of initial conditions which you specify is applied to the electrochemical cell and the cell is allowed to equilibrate to these conditions.

    Parameter Setup

    each parameter should be in separate boxes

    Basic Parameters Tab

    You can click on the “I Feel Lucky” button (located at the top of the setup) to fill in all the parameters with typical default values (see Figure 1). You may want to change the Duration in the Electrolysis period box to a value which is appropriate for the electrochemical system being studied. You may also want to change the Number of intervals in the Sampling Control box.

    Basic setup

    Figure 1: Basic Setup for OCP.

    Post Experiment Conditions Tab

    After the Relaxation Period, the Post Experiment Conditions are applied to the cell. Typically, the cell is disconnected but you may also specify the conditions applied to the cell. Please see the separate discussion on post experiment conditions for more information.

    Typical Results

    info

    Theory

    info

    Application

    info

    Additional Resources

    any related links

    Read More
  • Staircase Voltammetry (SCV)

    AfterMath_NEW
          This article is part of the AfterMath Data Organizer Electrochemistry Guide

    Staircase voltammetry (SCV) involves sweeping the potential of the working electrode linearly with time at rates faster than CV, typically between 10 V/s and 100 V/s. The current is plotted as a function of potential to yield a voltammogram. The difference between SCV and CV is that you choose the size and duration of the each potential step.

    Detailed Description

    Though there are similarities between SCV and CV and LSV, SCV allows more control of the waveform that is applied to the working electrode. CV and LSV waveforms are optimized to take full advantage of the resolution of the potentiostat’s digital-to-analog converter, while the waveform in SCV is designed for much higher sweep rates than typically encountered in CV or LSV.

    Like most of the other electrochemical techniques offered by the AfterMath software, this experiment begins with an induction period. During the induction period, a set of initial conditions is applied to the electrochemical cell and the cell is allowed to equilibrate to these conditions. The default initial condition involves holding the working electrode potential at the Initial Potential for a brief period of time (i.e., 3 seconds).

    In Linear Staircase Voltammetry (LSCV), after the induction period, the potential of the working electrode is stepped from the Initial Potential to the Final Potential in Step amplitude increments. The period of each step is controlled by the Step period increment. In Cyclic Staircase Voltammetry (CSCV), using a two segment experiment as an example, the electrode potential is swept from the Initial potential to the Upper potential or Lower potential, then reversed and swept to the Final potential.

    After the sweeping has finished, the experiment concludes with a relaxation period. The default condition during the relaxation period involves holding the working electrode potential at the final potential for an additional brief period of time (i.e., 1 seconds).

    At the end of the relaxation period, the post experiment idle conditions are applied to the cell, the instrument returns to the idle state and, if necessary, post experiment processing is done.

    Current is plotted as a function of the potential applied to the working electrode, resulting in a voltammogram.

    Parameter Setup

    The parameters for this method are arranged on various tabs on the setup panel. The most commonly used parameters are on the Basic tab, and less commonly used parameters are on the Advanced tab. Additional tabs for Ranges and post experiment idle conditions are common to all of the electrochemical techniques supported by the AfterMath software. There is also a tab for Post experiment processing.

    Basic Tab

    The first part of the Basic Parameter Tab section covers LSCV. The second portion covers CSCV. The Ranges, Advanced, Post Experiment Idle Conditions and Post Experiment Processing tabs are common to both variants of SCV.

    You can click on the “I Feel Lucky” button (located at the top of the setup) to fill in all the parameters with typical default values. You will no doubt need to change the default parameters to values appropriate for the system you are studying.

    Linear Staircase Voltammetry Setup

    Figure 1: Basic Linear Staircase Voltammetry Setup

    Cyclic Staircase Voltammetry (CSCV)
    You can click on the “I Feel Lucky” button (located at the top of the setup) to fill in all the parameters with typical default values.

    Cyclic Staircase Voltammetry Setup

    Figure 2: Basic Cyclic Staircase Voltammetry Setup


    The Electrode Range on the Basic tab is used to specify the expected range of current. If the choice of electrode range is too small, actual current may go off scale and be truncated. If the electrode range is too large, the voltammogram may have a noisy, choppy, or quantized appearance.

    Some Pine potentiostats (such as the WaveNow and WaveNano portable USB potentiostats) have current autoranging capability. To take advantage of this feature, set the electrode range parameter to “Auto”. This allows the potentiostat to choose the current range “on-the-fly” while the voltammogram is being acquired. The time it takes to update the current range may cause plateauing during portions of the voltammogram when sweep rates are very high and the Sample window is close to the Step period increment. You will manually have to choose a current range should this happen.

    The waveform that is applied to the electrode is determined by the Step amplitude increment and Step period increment (orange trace in Figure 4A and 4B) and the effective sweep rate is determined by dividing the Step amplitude increment by the Step period increment. The Sample window is the time before the next step when the current is measured (black squares in Figures 3A and 3B) and is analogous to the parameter alpha in CV and LSV.

    WaveformZoomed in of Waveform

    Figure 3: Cyclic Staircase Voltammetry Waveform Details: Total waveform (A), Zoom of waveform showing steps (B)

    Advanced Tab

    The Advanced Tab for this method (see Figure 4) allows you to change the behavior of the potentiostat during the induction period and relaxation period. By default, the potential applied to the working electrode during the induction and relaxation period will match the initial potential and final potential, respectively, as specified on the Basic Tab. You may override this default behavior, and you may also change the durations of the induction and relaxation periods if you wish.

    Advanced parameters

    Figure 4: Advanced parameters for Cyclic Staircase Voltammetry

    Ranges Tab

    AfterMath has the ability to automatically select the appropriate ranges for voltage and current during an experiment. However, you can also choose to enter the voltage and current ranges for an experiment. Please see the separate discussions on autoranging and the Ranges Tab for more information.

    Post Experiment Conditions Tab

    After the Relaxation Period, the Post Experiment Conditions are applied to the cell. Typically, the cell is disconnected but you may also specify the conditions applied to the cell. Please see the separate discussion on post experiment conditions for more information.

    Post Experiment Processing Tab

    After the post experiment conditions have been applied to the cell, the Post Experiment Processing is done. AfterMath can automatically generated a Differential voltammogram by checking the check box on the Post Experiment Processing tab.

    Typical Results

    Typical results for a  1.5 \; mM solution of Ferrocene in  0.1 \; M \; Bu_4NClO_4/MeCN are shown below. Two different sweep rates have been shown along with different Sample windows.

    The first typical result is at  10 \; V/s with Sample windows of  1 \; ms (see Figure 5A) and  5 \; ms (see Figure 5B). Note that the Electrode current range was set to “Auto.”

    10V/s 1 ms sample window10 V/s 5 ms sample window

    Figure 5: Staircase Voltammograms of a Ferrocene Solution with a) 1 ms and b) 5 ms Sample Windows

    Theory

    The following section will discuss differences between SCV and CV. Please see Bard and Faulkner1 for a more detailed description of the technique. Under ideal conditions or conditions where uncompensated resistance is negligible SCV should produce results identical to CV. The voltammogram in Figure 6 is an example where uncompensated resistance is not negligible, as evidenced by the large peak separation. At very high sweep rates, it is possible that kinetic effects can be masked as uncompensated resistance. A plot of  {\Delta} E_p \; vs \; {\nu}^{1/2} should extrapolate to  RT/nF when a large  {\Delta}E_p is caused only by uncompensated resistance.

    Both CV and SCV utilize staircase waveforms (as opposed to truly linear waveforms generated in analog instruments), however, CV is optimized to take full advantage of the resolution of the potentiostat’s digital-to-analog converter. SCV gives you the ability to control the step height and duration giving you access to sweep rates greater than  10 \; V/s . Both techniques give you the ability to choose when current is measured and thus give the ability to minimize background charging currents. In CV, the parameter Alpha determines when current is sampled. A value of “0” means that the current is sampled immediately after the potential step, and a value of “100” means that the current is sampled immediately prior to the potential step. In SCV, the parameter Sample window determines the point at which current is sampled before the next potential step. Therefore, in SCV, a Sample window of  5 \; ms and Step period increment of  10 \; ms corresponds to an Alpha of 50 in CV. Theoretically, it is best to sample at  1/4 of the sample window, meaning an Alpha of 75 in CV or a Sample window of 1/4*(Step period increment) in SCV.2 Today’s high resolution digital-to-analog converters make it unlikely that changing the point at which the current is sampled will noticeably alter the voltammogram of a species in solution. It is possible that changing the point at which current is sampled for a surface-bound species will introduce artifacts or alter the voltammogram significantly. Pexing He has explored this point in the literature.3 Finally, several discussions comparing SCV and CV have been presented in the literature.4-8

    Application

    The following two examples employ staircase voltammetry to generate high sweep rates. Please see the Application section of CV for examples using staircase voltammetry to generate waveforms with lower sweep rates.

    The first example uses staircase voltammetry to generate sweep rates as high as  200 \; V/s . Baur et al.9 used staircase voltammetry to detect biogenic amines. These high sweep rates have three advantages. One, they allow for the detection of these species while preventing the formation of an insulating layer. Two, they allow extracellular detection of these amines in the brain. And three, they discriminate against chemical events after the initial electron transfer.

    In another example, Heering et al.10 used SCV to measure electron transfer rates of an adsorbed species. The researchers showed that SCV becomes independent of step amplitude and similar to CV at high sweep rates ( {\nu} > 10 \; k_0E_{step} ) if the current is sampled at  1/2 of the step period. The researchers determined the rate constant and n for adsorbed yeast cytochrome c peroxidase. Values obtained from SCV were comparable to more traditional methods such as chronoamperometry (CA).

    Read More
  • Stripping Voltammetry (SV)

    AfterMath_NEW
          This article is part of the AfterMath Data Organizer Electrochemistry Guide

    Species of interest are preconcentrated on an electrode surface or into a Hg electrode (in the form of a Hanging Mercury Dropping Electrode, HMDE or a Mercury Film Electrode, MFE), then essentially “stripped” from the HMDE, MFE, or other electrode surface for qualitative or quantitative purposes. Current is plotted as a function of potential.

    Synonyms: Inverse voltammetry

    Detailed Description

    Like most of the other electrochemical techniques offered by the AfterMath software, this experiment begins with an induction period, also called a cleaning period for this technique. During this time, a set of initial conditions is applied to the electrochemical cell and the cell is allowed to equilibrate to these conditions. The default initial condition involves holding the working electrode potential at a cleaning potential for a specified period of time.

    After the induction period, the potential of the working electrode is stepped to a deposition potential for another specified period of time. Solutions are typically stirred for an HMDE, or a rotating disk electrode (glassy carbon or wax-impregnated graphite) is employed for MFE in order to maintain constant conditions for the deposition process. After the deposition period, stirring is stopped in the case of a HMDE. Next, the potential of the working electrode is linearly swept, or stepped through a series of pulses, from the Initial potential to the Final potential.

    After the sequence has finished, the experiment concludes with a relaxation period. The default condition during the relaxation period involves holding the working electrode potential at the final potential for an additional brief period of time (i.e., 1 seconds).

    At the end of the relaxation period, the post experiment conditions are applied to the cell and the instrument returns to the idle state.

    Current is plotted as a function of the potential applied to the working electrode, resulting in a voltammogram.

    Parameters

    The three variants mentioned above, Anodic Stripping Voltammetry (ASV), Differential Pulse Stripping Voltammetry (DPSV), and Square Wave Stripping Voltammetry (SWSV), are three separate experiment types in AfterMath but will all be covered in this wiki. Another variant, called Cathodic Stripping Voltmmetry (CSV) can be employed by using an anodic deposition potential, and is useful in examination of halides. CSV will not be covered in the parameter setup area.

    The parameters for these methods are arranged on various tabs on the setup panel. The most commonly used parameters are on the Basic tab, and less commonly used parameters are on the Advanced tab. Each of these two tabs will be discussed separately for ASV, DPSV, and SWSV. Additional tabs for Ranges and Post experiment conditions are common to all of the electrochemical techniques supported by the AfterMath software and will be discussed after the Basic and Advanced tabs sections.

    Anodic Stripping Voltammetry

    Basic Tab

    For ASV, you can click on the “I Feel Lucky” button (located at the top of the setup) to fill in all the parameters with typical default values (see Figure 1). Though not typically necessary, you can increase the Duration in the Cleaning period. You may need to change the Potential and Duration in the Deposition period box. Note that you should be several tenths of a volt more negative than the  E^{\circ} for your species of interest. You will also want to enter a Speed in the Rotator parameters box if you are use an RDE. You may need to change the Initial potential, Final potential, and Sweep rate in the Stripping (sweep) period box to values which are appropriate for the electrochemical system being studied. Finally, you may leave the Electrode Range on Auto or manually choose the expected range of currents. This behavior can also be modified on the Range tab.

    ASV Basic setup

    Figure 1: Basic setup for ASV.

    The waveform that is applied to the electrode is not truly linear, but rather a series of small steps which are generated using the maximum available resolution for the potentiostat's digital-to-analog converter (DAC). Please see the CV wiki for a detailed discussion regarding the waveform applied to the electrode after the deposition step.

    Advanced Tab

    The Advanced Tab for this method (see Figure 2) allows you to change the behavior of the potentiostat during the relaxation period. By default, the potential applied to the working electrode during the induction/cleaning and relaxation period will match the initial potential and final potential, respectively, as specified on the Basic Tab. You may override the default behavior of relaxation period if you wish.

    Other important parameters on the Advanced tab are found in the Deposition sampling control and Sampling area. The Minimum number of samples in the Deposition sampling control determines how many times the current is measured during the deposition period. The Sampling box contains two parameters, Alpha and Threshold which control when and how samples are acquired during the sweep portion of the experiment.

    ASV Advanced parameters

    Figure 2: Advanced parameters for ASV

    As mentioned previously, the waveform applied to the electrode is not truly linear (see Figure 3 of CV for a typical waveform). The actual waveform is a staircase of small potential steps. The duration of each small step is called the step period, and the step period is automatically chosen to take full advantage of the resolution of the potentiostat's digital-to-analog converter.

    The Alpha parameter controls the exact time within the step period at which the current is sampled. A alpha value of zero means the current is sampled at the start of the step period, immediately after a new potential step is applied. An alpha value of 100 means the current is sampled at the end of the step period, immediately before the next potential step is applied.

    Changing alpha will have little effect on the voltammogram for a freely diffusing species in solution; however, variations in alpha can dramatically influence the results for surface bound species as will be the case with ASV, especially when using older potentiostats with low DAC resolution (i.e., 12-bit).

    Newer potentiostats (such as the WaveNow and WaveNano portable USB potentiostats) have 16-bit DAC resolution, so voltammograms acquired using these instruments are less influenced by the choice of alpha value. Further details can be found in the literature1 and in a related article about CBP Bipotentiostat Interface Boards.

    The Threshold parameter helps you to limit the amount of data retained as the voltammogram is acquired. The threshold parameter controls the interval between samples as the potential is swept from one limit to another. By default, a data point is acquired every time the sweep moves  \text{5 mV} . You can change the threshold from  \text{5 mV} to a smaller interval (if you want to acquire more data) or to a greater interval (if you want to acquire less data).

    Extreme values for the threshold parameter can lead to undesirable results. A smaller threshold value, typically less than or equal to  \text{5 mV} , produces smoother curves and larger data files. If you set the threshold parameter to zero, then the maximum number of data points is acquired (and the size of the resulting data file will be quite large). If you set the parameter to a very large interval, then the number of points acquired will be so small that the voltammogram appears sharp and jagged.

    Differential Pulse Stripping Voltammetry

    Basic Tab

    The parameters for DPSV, along with the default values are shown in Figure 3. You will likely need to change the Potential and Duration in the Deposition period box. Note that you should be several tenths of a volt more negative than the  E^{/circ} for your species of interest. You will also want to enter a Speed in the Rotator parameters box if you are use an RDE. You may need to change the Initial potential and Final potential in the Stripping period baseline box to values which are appropriate for the electrochemical system being studied. The default parameters in the Stripping period pulse box are a good starting point for many DPV experiments. Finally, though you may leave the Electrode Range on Auto, it is recommended that you manually choose the expected range of currents in a pulse experiment.

    DPSV Basic setup

    Figure 3: Basic setup for DPSV.

    The waveform that is applied to the electrode in DPV is a sequence of pulses (see Figure 3 of DPV for a typical waveform). The total length of each pulse in the sequence is determined by the Period. The potential of the working electrode is stepped according to the Height for the period of time specified by the Width. The potential of the working electrode is then stepped back but only by the Height minus the Potential increment. The current is sampled at two points in each pulse. The first point is just prior to stepping the potential of the working electrode, and the second point comes at the end of each period just prior to stepping the potential of the working electrode back to begin the next pulse period.

    Advanced Tab

    The Advanced Tab for this method (see Figure 4) allows you to change the behavior of the potentiostat during the relaxation period. By default, the potential applied to the working electrode during the induction/cleaning and relaxation periods will match the initial potential and final potential, respectively, as specified on the Basic Tab. You may override the default behavior of relaxation period if you wish.

    DPSV Advanced setup

    Figure 4: Basic setup for DPSV.

    Square Wave Stripping Voltammetry

    Basic Tab

    The typical experimental setup for SWSV is shown in Figure 5. You will likely need to change the Potential and Duration in the Deposition period box. Note that you should be several tenths of a volt more negative than the  E^{/circ} for your species of interest. You will also want to enter a Speed in the Rotator parameters box if you are use an RDE. You may need to change the Initial potential and Final potential in the Stripping period box to values which are appropriate for the electrochemical system being studied. The default parameters in the Stripping period box relating to the square wave are a good starting point for many SWV experiments. As in DPSV and all other pulse techniques, you may leave the Electrode Range on Auto but it is recommended that you manually choose the expected range of currents in a pulse experiment. This behavior can also be modified on the Range tab.

    SWSV Basic setup

    Figure 5: Basic setup for SWSV.

    Advanced Tab

    The Advanced Tab for this method (see Figure 6) allows you to change the behavior of the potentiostat during the relaxation period. By default, the potential applied to the working electrode during the induction/cleaning and relaxation period will match the initial potential and final potential, respectively, as specified on the Basic Tab. You may override the default behavior of relaxation period if you wish.

    Other important parameters on the Advanced tab are found in the Deposition sampling control. The Minimum number of samples in the Deposition sampling control determines how many times the current is measured during the deposition period.

    SWSV Advanced parameters

    Figure 6: Advanced parameters for SWSV

    Range and Post Experiment Conditions

    Ranges and Post experiment conditions are common to all of the electrochemical techniques supported by the AfterMath software. Both of these tabs are discussed below.

    Range Tab

    AfterMath has the ability to automatically select the appropriate ranges for voltage and current during an experiment but as with all pulse techniques, it is best to manually choose the expected range of currents. Please see the separate discussions on autoranging and the Ranges Tab for more information.

    Post Experiment Conditions Tab

    After the Relaxation Period, the Post Experiment Conditions are applied to the cell. Typically, the cell is disconnected but you may also specify the conditions applied to the cell. Please see the separate discussion on post experiment conditions for more information.

    Typical Results

    Below are the typical results for the determination of  Pb^{2+} in solution ( 0.3 \; {\mu}M \; Pb^{2+} in  \text{0.1 M} \; KNO_3 with  20 \; {\mu}M \; Hg^{2+}, \; 5 mm GC WE, deposition =  \text{5 min} @  \text{-0.7 V,} \; {\omega} = 2000 \; rpm, \text{v = 0.1 V/s} ). Note for quantitation purposes, it is best to build a calibration curve.

    Typical Results

    Figure 7: ASV of a Lead(II) solution

    Figure 8 shows the typical results for the detection of several metal species, with concentrations ranging from  0.4 \; {\mu}M to  0.5 \; {\mu}M , in solution (experimental concentrations and conditions are as listed:  0.5 \; {\mu}M \; Cd^{2+},  0.4 \; {\mu}M \; Pb^{2+}, and  0.4 \; {\mu}M \; Cu^{2+} in  \text{0.1 M} \; KNO_3 with  20 \; {\mu}M \; Hg^{2+},  \text{5 mm} GC WE, deposition =  \text{5 min} @  \text{-0.7 V,} \; {\omega} = 2000 \; rpm, \text{v = 0.1 V/s} .

    Mixture

    Figure 8: ASV of a Solution of Mixed Metal Species

    Theory

    The following is a brief introduction to to the theory Stripping Voltammetry using a Mercury Film Electrode (MFE). Stripping Voltammetry was traditionally done using an HMDE, which will not be discussed in detail here. For more information, please consult the literature.2 ASV will be discussed first, followed by DPSV, SWSV, and finally CSV. All of the techniques discussed here consist of two steps – 1. Electrodeposition and 2. Stripping. Electrodeposition for the three anodic techniques (ASV, DPSV, and SWSV) is the same and will be discussed first, followed by the stripping analysis for each one individually. CSV will be discussed lastly and independently of the other techniques.

    Anodic Electrodeposition

    The deposition takes place by applying a potential that is several tenths of a volt more negative than the E0 of the least easily reduced species in solution. Current practice is to add mercuric ion (10 uM to 100 uM) to the solution, so that mercury codeposits with the analyte in the form of a thin film.

    Stripping Analysis

    ASV

    At the end of the deposition time in ASV, the analyte is “stripped” from the MFE by sweeping the potential of the electrode linearly to more positive values. Consider the reaction O + e → R, with formal potential E0. All of the material in the MFE is deposited as R. The potential of the electrode is scanned from a value sufficiently negative of the E0 to values sufficiently positive of E0 in order to oxidize R. If the stripping is assumed to be reversible, the Nernst equation holds at the surface and the peak current, ip is given by the the equation

    MFE Equation

    where n and F are as above, v is the scan rate (V/s), l is the film thickness (cm), A is the electrode area (cm2), C is the concentration (mol/cm3), R is the universal gas constant (8.314 J/mol K), and T is the absolute temperature (K). However, the film thickness is not easily obtained so it is easier to use a series of standards of known concentrations to construct a calibration curve for purposes of quantitation.

    DPSV

    The theory of DPSV is similar to DPV and has been covered by Copeland et al.3 and Osteryoung and Christie4.

    DPV is a technique that is designed to minimize background charging currents. The waveform in DPV is a sequence of pulses, where a baseline potential is held for a specified period of time prior to the application of a potential pulse. Current is sampled, at a point just prior to the application of the potential pulse. The potential is then stepped by a small amount (typically < 100 mV) and current is sampled again at the end of the pulse. The potential of the working electrode is then stepped back by a lesser value than during the forward pulse such that baseline potential of each pulse is incremented throughout the sequence.

    Consider a reaction O + e → R, where O is reduced in a one electron step to R. Since deposition was carried out cathodically, the MFE contains only R. At values sufficiently more negative than E0' no faradaic current flows before the potential step (to more positive values). The application of the potential step does not produce an appreciable increase in current. Thus, the differential is very small. At values significantly positive of E0' the baseline potential is oxidizing R at a maximum rate. The application of a small potential step (towards more positive values) is unlikely to increase the rate of oxidation and hence the differential current is again small. Only at potentials around E0' will the differential current be significant. The period during the application of the baseline potential has R being oxidized at some rate. The potential step (to more positive values) increases the rate of oxidation and hence the differential current will be significant.

    Interestingly though, DPSV will not offer much in terms of improved sensitivity over ASV since the species of interest is dissolved back into the film with each pulse. The advantage to DPSV is that the charging current is greatly reduced.

    SWSV

    The theoretical treatment for SWSV is similar to SWV and has been examined by Knouvaes et al.5 SWSV offers an advantage over both ASV and DPSV in that thinner films actually produce higher sensitivity and peak heights. Maximum peak height is obtained when the film thickness is the same as the diffusion layer thickness.

    Consider a reaction O + e → R, where O is reduced in a one electron reaction to R with formal potential, E0. The deposition process causes all O to be reduced to R in the MFE. An initial potential is applied to the electrode that is significantly more negative than E0. No significant faradaic current flows upon the application of forward pulse towards more positive values. Current is sampled at a specified point during the forward pulse.

    The reverse pulse consists of stepping the potential of the working electrode to more negative values and the current is sampled near the end of the reverse pulse. The difference current is calculated by subtracting the reverse current from the forward current.

    As the potential of the working electrode approaches E0 a faradaic current flows due to oxidation of R. Upon application of the reverse pulse, a faradaic current flows in that effectively reduces the O was was produced during the forward pulse. In other words, the rate of oxidation slows compared to the forward step, hence an cathodic current flows. Once the potential of the working electrode is sufficiently more positive of E0 the current is diffusion-limited in both the forward forward and reverse pulses and the difference current is small.

    CSV

    CSV has been used in the detection of halides, sulfides, selenide, cyanide, cyanoferroate and thiols. No extensive theory shall be presented here regarding this technique, rather you are directed to the numerous reviews (Brainina6, Brainina’s book7, and Vypra8) of stripping voltammetry and references therein regarding CSV. The experimental setup is the opposite of ASV and the underlying electrochemical processes are different. For example, an Ag electrode can be used for the determination of halides, considering the oxidation of silver in the presence of X produces the insoluble salt, AgX.

    Applications

    The first application is chosen to show the effect of the substrate on the determination of ions in solution. Florence9 compared the stripping curves for an HMDE, pyrolytic graphite, unpolished glassy carbon and polish glassy carbon electrodes. The graphite and glassy carbon electrodes were rotated in the solutions that also contained Hg2+ in order to produce a thin film. Depositions times were 30 minutes for the HMDE and 5 minutes for the other electrodes. In the final side-by-side comparison, the three carbon-based electrodes showed superior selectivity with the polished glassy carbon electrode also showing the best signal-to-noise ratio of the three.

    The second application utilizes DPSV for determination of Hg in seawater. Gustavvson10 deposited Hg on to a rotating Au disc electrode. By removing interfering organic material through decomposition with UV light prior to analysis, the researcher was able to detect Hg at concentrations as low as 10 pM.

    In the third example, Wang et al.11 used bismuth-coated carbon electrodes for the detection of cadmium, lead, thallium, and zinc. Bi is an attractive alternative to Hg from an environmental standpoint but also from a selectivity standpoint since the formal potentials in Bi are slightly different than in Hg. The researchers used short depositions times (2-10 minutes) to create the thin films and square wave voltammetry for the determination down to the ppb level.

    The fourth application is an example of CSV. Piche and Kubiak12 used CSV to detect arsenic at concentrations as low as 0.06 nM. The researchers speculate that copper and sodium diethyldithiocarbamate aid to form an amalgam with Ar(III) on the surface of the electrode in as little as 50 s. Upon sweeping cathodically, Ar(III) is reduced to ArH3. One of the advantages with this method is the ability to discern Ar(III) from Ar(V) making it superior to methods such as ICP-MS and Atomic Absortpion Spectroscopy.

    Read More
  • Relaxation Period

    AfterMath_NEW
          This article complements the AfterMath Data Organizer Electrochemistry Guide

    At the end of an experiment, you may specify a period of time during which particular signal level(s) are applied to the working electrode(s), perhaps to allow the cell to re-equilibrate with a set of conditions where no electrochemical activity is occurring. During this “relaxation period”, no data is acquired.

    Careful choice of the proper relaxation conditions is required when you are attempting to mitigate the affects of cell switching. You can adjust the relaxation period conditions to match the post-experiment idle conditions.

    The default duration of the relaxation period is usually one (1) second. The default signal level (unless otherwise specified) is typically selected to match the final signal level of the waveform being applied to the working electrode during the active portion of the experiment.

    Immediately after the relaxation period expires, the experiment is complete, and the post-experiment idle conditions are imposed on the electrochemical cell.

    Read More
  • Rotating Disk Electrochemistry (RDE)

    AfterMath_NEW
          This article is part of the AfterMath Data Organizer Electrochemistry Guide

    Rotating disk electrochemistry is a technique that involves rotating the working electrode while the potential of the electrode is swept from an initial value to a final value. The current is plotted as a function of potential to yield a voltammogram.

    Detailed Description

    Like most of the other electrochemical techniques offered by the AfterMath software, this experiment begins with an induction period. During the induction period, a set of initial conditions is applied to the electrochemical cell and the cell is allowed to equilibrate to these conditions. The default initial condition involves holding the working electrode potential at the Initial Potential for a brief period of time (i.e., 3 seconds). If the potentiostat is being used to control the rotator speed, the rotator is also spun at the desired Speed during this time. The WaveNow and WaveNano are capable of outputting a potential proportional to the desired rotator speed. This output can then be coupled to the input on an MSR rotator for fully automated control of the rotation speed.

    For a typical one segment RDE experiment, after the induction period, the potential of the working electrode is swept linearly at the specified Sweep Rate from the Initial Potential to the Final Potential. Typical sweep rates are  <50 \; mV/s . The Typical Results section below shows the effect of sweep rates that are too large.

    After the sweep has finished, the experiment concludes with a relaxation period. The default condition during the relaxation period involves holding the working electrode potential at the final potential for an additional brief period of time (i.e., 1 seconds).

    At the end of the relaxation period, the post experiment idle conditions are applied to the cell and the instrument returns to the idle state.

    Current is plotted as a function of the potential applied to the working electrode, resulting in a voltammogram.

    Parameter Setup

    The parameters for this method are arranged on various tabs on the setup panel. The most commonly used parameters are on the Basic tab, and less commonly used parameters are on the Advanced tab. Additional tabs for Ranges and post experiment idle conditions are common to all of the electrochemical techniques supported by the AfterMath software.

    Basic Tab

    You can click on the “I Feel Lucky” button (located at the top of the setup) to fill in all the parameters with typical default values. You will no doubt need to change the Initial Potential, Final Potential, and Sweep Rate to values which are appropriate for the electrochemical system being studied.

    The Basic tab contains the same parameters as CV or LSV plus a Speed parameter (see Figure 1). This is because RDE is typically treated as a steady-state CV or LSV experiment. Please see the Theory section below for a more thorough description. If you choose one segment, you must enter the Initial potential, Final potential, Sweep rate, and rotator Speed.

    One Segment RDE

    Figure 1: Basic tab setup for one segment RDE

    If you choose two segments, then you need to enter the Initial potential, Vertex potential, Final potential, Sweep rate, and rotator Speed. (see Figure 2).

    Two Segment RDE

    Figure 2: Basic tab setup for two segment RDE

    The Electrode Range on the Basic tab is used to specify the expected range of current. If the choice of electrode range is too small, actual current may go off scale and be truncated. If the electrode range is too large, the voltammogram may have a noisy, choppy, or quantized appearance. Please see the ugly duckling page for more information.

    Some Pine potentiostats (such as the WaveNow and WaveNano portable USB potentiostats) have current autoranging capability. To take advantage of this feature, set the electrode range parameter to “Auto”. This allows the potentiostat to choose the current range “on-the-fly” while the voltammogram is being acquired.

    The actual waveform that is applied to the electrode is linear but not truly analog (see Figure 3A). The flat portions at the beginning and end of the waveform are the induction and relaxation periods, respectively. A typical two segment sweep starts at an initial potential, sweeps to a vertex potential, and then returns to a final potential. The sweep is not perfect; in reality is consists of many small steps (see Figure 3B, black trace, sweep rate  = 20 \; mV/s ) which are generated using the maximum available resolution of the potentiostat's digital-to-analog converter (DAC).

    Waveform Zoomed in of Waveform

    Figure 3: Two Segment RDE Waveform Details of A) the Total Waveform and B) a Magnified Waveform showing the Stepped, Applied Potential (black) and Measured Potential (red)

    While RDE typically consists of one or two segments it is possible to choose any number of segments. If you choose any odd number of segments greater than two (see Figure 4), the parameters that must be entered are a little different than the two segment case. You must choose an Initial Potential, Upper Potential, Lower Potential, and Final potential. You must also choose whether the Initial direction is rising (sweep towards Upper Potential) or falling (sweep towards Lower Potential). If the Initial direction is rising, the Final potential must be different than the Lower potential. If the Initial direction is falling, the Final potential must be different than the Upper potential.

    Three Segment RDE

    Figure 4: Basic tab setup for three segment RDE

    If you choose any even number of segments greater than two (see Figure 5) the parameters that must be entered are the same as the three segment case. You must choose an Initial Potential, Upper Potential, Lower Potential, and Final potential. You must also choose whether the first sweep is initially rising (sweep towards Upper Potential) or falling (sweep towards Lower Potential). If the Initial direction is rising, the Final potential must be different than the Upper potential. If the Initial direction is falling, the Final potential must be different than the Lower potential.

    Four Segment RDE

    Figure 5: Basic tab setup for four segment RDE

    Advanced Tab

    The Advanced Tab for this method (see Figure 6) allows you to change the behavior of the potentiostat during the induction period and relaxation period. By default, the potential applied to the working electrode during the induction and relaxation period will match the initial potential and final potential, respectively, as specified on the Basic Tab. You may override this default behavior, and you may also change the durations of the induction and relaxation periods if you wish.

    Other important parameters on the Advanced tab are found in the Sampling Control area. This area contains two parameters, Alpha and Threshold which control when and how samples are acquired during the sweep portion of the experiment.

    Advanced parameters

    Figure 6: Advanced parameters for RDE

    As mentioned previously, the waveform applied to the electrode (see Figure 3) is not truly linear. The actual waveform is a staircase of small potential steps. The duration of each small step is called the step period, and the step period is automatically chosen to take full advantage of the resolution of the potentiostat's digital-to-analog converter.

    The Alpha parameter controls the exact time within the step period at which the current is sampled. A alpha value of zero means the current is sampled at the start of the step period, immediately after a new potential step is applied. An alpha value of 100 means the current is sampled at the end of the step period, immediately before the next potential step is applied.

    Changing alpha will have little effect on the voltammogram for a freely diffusing species in solution; however, variations in alpha can dramatically influence the results for surface bound species, especially when using older potentiostats with low DAC resolution (i.e., 12-bit).

    Newer potentiostats (such as the WaveNow and WaveNano portable USB potentiostats) have 16-bit DAC resolution, so voltammograms acquired using these instruments are less influenced by the choice of alpha value. Nevertheless, researchers who use digital potentiostats to study surface-confined electrochemical systems (rather than freely diffusing species in solution) should be aware of the influence of this parameter. Further details can be found in the literature1 and in a related article about CBP Bipotentiostat Interface Boards.

    The Threshold parameter helps you to limit the amount of data retained as the voltammogram is acquired. The threshold parameter controls the interval between samples as the potential is swept from one limit to another. By default, a data point is acquired every time the sweep moves 5 millivolts. You can change the threshold from 5 millivolts to a smaller interval (if you want to acquire more data) or to a greater interval (if you want to acquire less data).

    Extreme values for the threshold parameter can lead to undesirable results (see Figure 7 of cyclic voltammetry). A very small Threshold value will produce smooth curves yet results in large files. A very large value though, results in jagged curves.

    Range Tab

    AfterMath has the ability to automatically select the appropriate ranges for voltage and current during an experiment. However, you can also choose to enter the voltage and current ranges for an experiment. Please see the separate discussions on autoranging and the Ranges Tab for more information.

    Post Experiment Conditions Tab

    After the Relaxation Period, the Post Experiment Conditions are applied to the cell. Typically, the cell is disconnected but you may also specify the conditions applied to the cell. Please see the separate discussion on post experiment conditions for more information.

    Typical Results

    The typical results for a one electrode reversible redox process is a sigmoidal shaped voltammogram (see Figure 7, specific parameters were:  0.5 \; mM Ferrocene in  0.1 \; M \; Bu_4NClO_4/MeCN ,  5 \; mm Pt disk,  1000 \; rpm ,  20 \; mV/s ).

    Typical Result

    Figure 7: Rotating Disk Voltammogram of a Ferrocene Solution

    The limiting current can be obtained from the voltammogram by right clicking on the trace and selecting “Add Tool » Peak Height” (see Figure 8, specific parameters were:  0.5 \; mM Ferrocene in  0.1 \; M \; Bu_4NClO_4/MeCN ,  5 \; mm Pt disk,  500 \; rpm ,  20 \; mV/s ). The peak height that is initially drawn (see Figure 9, specific parameters were identical to Figure 8) may have to be changed to properly measure the limiting current.

    Add Tool>>Peak Height

    Figure 8: Addition of Peak Height Tool to Measure Limiting Current

    Peak Height

    Figure 9: Peak Height Tool Added

    By dragging the control points on the tool around you can draw a proper baseline (see Figure 10).

    Proper Baseline

    Figure 10: A Proper Baseline for Measurement of the Limiting Current

    The baseline type that is initially chosen typically does a good job for a one component reversible system such as that shown above. However, you can change the baseline type by right clicking on the tool and selecting “Properties” (see Figure 11).

    Properties

    Figure 11: Selection of Baseline Properties

    This will bring up a dialog box where you can select the type of baseline from the drop-down menu (see Figure 12).

    Baseline type selection

    Figure 12: Dialog Box Showing Baseline Types

    A series of rotation speeds was used to examine the  0.5 \; mM Ferrocene solution mentioned above (see Figure 13). The limiting current for a freely diffusing species in solution is proportional to the square root of the rotation speed (see Figure 13, inset).

    Varying Rotation Speed

    Figure 13: Effect of varying the rotation speed for a Ferrocene Solution from 300 – 2500 rpm. Inset: Plot of Limiting Current versus Square Root of Rotation Speed.

    Typical sweep rates are  <50 \; mV/s . As long as the system being studied remains in steady-state conditions, sweep rate will have no effect on the limting current. When sweep rates get fast, voltammograms obtained begin to look like typical cyclic voltammograms where the electrode is not rotated. This is due to depletion of the Levich layer of the species being oxidized or reduced. As an example, there is no difference between  20 \; mV/s and  50 \; mV/s sweep rates for a  0.5 \; mM Ferrocene solution when the rotator speed is  300 \; rpm (see Figure 14, Black trace =  20 \; mV/s (underneath Red trace), Red trace =  50 \; mV/s , Blue trace =  1 \; V/s , Green trace =  2.5 \; V/s ). However, when the sweep rate is  1 \; V/s or  2.5 \; V/s , the voltammograms show signs of depletion of the Levich layer and begin to resemble voltammograms seen in traditional CV. Please see the Theory section for more details if necessary.

    Effect of Sweep rate

    Figure 14: Effect of varying the Sweep Rate for a Ferrocene Solution.

    Theory

    The following theoretical introduction to RDE is intended to give the reader a general understanding so that they may better understand what parameters affect the outcome in a typical experiment. A more detailed description can be found in Bard and Faulkner.2 Rotating the electrode is a method of forced convection with the purpose of continually delivering material to the electrode in a controlled manner. The rotating rod creates a vortex flow underneath the electrode which pulls material upwards.

    The purpose of rotating the electrode is to keep the solution homogeneous. However, next to the electrode is a stagnant layer, called the Levich layer which actually “clings” to the electrode and rotates with it. Inside this layer, the primary mode of mass transport is diffusion. Even though the primary mode of mass transport is diffusion like in cyclic voltammetry, linear sweep voltammetry, or chronoamperometry the concentration gradient at the electrode remains constant with respect to time. Since the concentration gradient remains constant with respect to time, the current is a steady-state current.

    The thickness of the Levich layer will depend upon the experimental conditions and is governed by the equation

    {\delta}_L = 1.61 D^{1/3}{\omega}^{-1/2}{\nu}^{1/6}

    where  D is the diffusion coefficient (in  cm^2/s ),  \omega is the rotation speed ( rad/s ), and  \nu is the kinematic viscosity (in  cm^2/s , see Table 1).

    Table 1: Kinematic Viscosities for 0.1 \; M \; Et_4NClO_4 Solutions at  25^{\circ}C 1
    Solution {\nu} (cm^2/s)
    H_2O 0.009132
    H_2O \; (0.1 \; M \; KCl) 0.008844
    MeCN (acetonitrile) 0.004536
    DMSO (dimethylsulfoxide) 0.01896
    Pyridine  0.009518
     DMF (dimethylformamide) 0.008971
    N,N-Dimethylacetamide 0.01067
    HMPA (hexamethylphosphoramide)  0.03530
     D_2O  0.01028

    The limiting current at electrode is proportional to the thickness of the Levich layer and is defined by

    i_l = nFAC\left(\frac{D}{\delta}\right)

    where  n is the number of electrons in the electrochemical reaction,  F is Faraday's constant ( 96485 /; C/mol ),  A is the electrode area (in  cm^2 ), and  C is the concentration (in  mol/cm^3 ). Finally, the fully expanded limiting current is defined by the Levich equation,

    i_l = nFAD^{2/3}{\omega}^{1/2}{\nu}^{-1/6}C.

    Application

    In the first example, Gallaway and Barton3 coated an electrode with an oxygen-reducing enzyme and a series of redox-polymers. The purpose of this was to examine mediated electron transfer in a biocatalyzed fuel cell. Varying the type of redox-polymer used, the researchers were able to examine rate constants as a function of overpotential between the enzyme and mediator. These data were then used to determine the optimum polymer redox potential in order to get maximum power output for a hypothetical biofuel cell.

    The next example uses RDE to examine the reduction of ferricyanide, in the prescence of methylene blue (MB), at a DNA-modified electrode. Boon et al.4 used a gold-disk electrode that was modified with self-assembled monolayers of a double-stranded oligonucleotide selective for the adsorption of MB. The rate limiting step was determined, from RDE, to be the adsorption of MB onto the electrode. Despite slow sweep rates, the resulting voltammograms showed interesting “peak-shaped” i-V traces that took several seconds to reach their steady-state values. These “peak-shaped” traces were attributed to the slow transfer of MB into and out of the film.

    The third example, Orilall et al.5 synthesized Pt and Pt-Pb nanoparticles and incorporated them into mesoporous niobium-oxide/carbon composites. Heat treating this composite made a graphitic-like material that was assembled onto a glassy carbon disk electrode. The researchers investigated this material for formic acid oxidation and found that it had a four times higher mass activity and lower onset potential than any previously reported Pt-Pb nanoparticles.

    In the fourth example, Zhang et al.6 used RDE to examine the reduction of oxygen. Multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) were functionalized with a Co-porphyrin complex and then mixed with Nafion. This material was then dropcast onto a glassy carbon disk electrode. RDE was then used to show that the mechanism for oxygen reduction was a direct four-proton and four-electron reduction of oxygen to water. These results showed that the materials would be a suitable substitute for platinum or other metal-based cathode materials in proton conducting membrane fuel cells.

    The fifth example uses RDE to examine the mechanism of electrochemical reduction of H2O2 on Cu in acidic sulfate solutions. Stewart and Gerwith7 studied the interaction of H2O2 with Cu because H2O2 is commonly used as an oxidizer component in chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) slurries. CMP is used in microelectronics applications. By using RDE, the researchers were able formulate a mechanism that involved a never observed before Cu(I) intermediate following peroxide exposure. The researchers went on to use other techniques to look for and find this Cu(I) intermediate.

    The final example shows how RDE can be used in a teaching lab for advanced undergraduate or first-year graduate chemistry or chemical engineering labs. Kear et al.8,9 use Cu disk electrodes in aerated sea water to examine the reduction of oxygen at a cathode surface. This is a way to introduce electrochemical engineering and corrosion to students and is informative in explaining cathodic kinetics in corrosion reactions. The students also used this experiment as a hand-on approach to learning about mass transfer since the examination of the limiting current at various rotation speeds allows for the calculation of the diffusion coefficient for oxygen.

    Read More